nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 4, 307-313
结直肠癌住院患者术后感染的病原菌分布特征及风险因素分析
基金项目(Foundation): 广东省基础与应用基础研究基金自然科学基金项目(2024A1515012131); 广州市科技计划项目(2023A03J0314)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.3785/syzlzz.2026.043
移动端阅读
摘要:

目的 分析结直肠癌(colorectal cancer, CRC)住院患者术后感染的病原菌分布及耐药情况,探讨术后感染的风险因素,为抗菌药物合理使用和感染防控提供参考。方法 回顾性收集2018年1月至2024年12月广州医科大学附属中医医院确诊CRC并接受手术治疗的1 200例患者,其中术后发生感染179例(术后感染组),采用近邻匹配法选取同期未发生术后感染患者179例作为对照组。分析术后感染组病原菌种类及药物敏感结果,并比较两组临床资料。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析筛选术后感染的独立风险因素。结果 179例术后感染患者中,泌尿道感染67例(37.43%),血流感染60例(33.52%),共分离出179株病原菌。其中,大肠埃希菌81株(45.25%)[产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(extended-spectrum β-lactamases,ESBLs)菌株49株(60.49%)],肺炎克雷伯菌21株(11.73%),铜绿假单胞菌18株(10.06%),金黄色葡萄球菌和其他球菌23株(12.84%),真菌20株(11.17%)。药物敏感试验结果显示,大肠埃希菌对亚胺培南[4株(4.94%)]和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦[5株(6.17%)]的耐药率较低。产ESBLs菌株对头孢菌素类和氨曲南等药物的耐药率均高于非产ESBLs菌株(均P<0.05)。肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌对部分头孢菌素的耐药率较高。革兰氏阳性菌对四环素[17株(73.91%)]和青霉素G[14株(60.87%)]的耐药率较高。单因素分析显示,体质量指数(body mass index, BMI)、合并糖尿病与高血压、术前白蛋白水平、手术时间、术中出血量、肿瘤位置、病理分化程度、淋巴结转移和肿瘤分期均与术后感染相关(均P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,BMI(OR=1.091,P=0.002)、合并糖尿病(OR=3.435,P<0.01)、手术时间(OR=1.012,P=0.003)和肿瘤分期Ⅲ~Ⅳ期(OR=4.289,P<0.01)均为CRC患者术后感染的独立危险因素,而术前白蛋白水平为保护因素(OR=0.883,P<0.01)。结论 CRC术后感染以血液和泌尿道感染为主;病原菌以大肠埃希菌为主,且耐药性复杂。CRC术后感染与代谢状态、手术创伤和肿瘤进展密切相关,需结合病原菌监测与风险因素管理优化抗菌药物的使用。

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the distribution and drug resistance of pathogens causing postoperative infection among hospitalized colorectal cancer(CRC) patients and the risk factors for postoperative infection, providing reference for rational use of antibiotics and infection control. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted among 1 200 patients diagnosed with CRC and treated surgically at the Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2018 to December 2024. A total of 179 patients with postoperative infection were included in the infection group, and 179 patients without postoperative infection were selected as the control group by nearest-neighbor matching. Pathogen species and antimicrobial susceptibility results in the infection group were analyzed. Clinical data were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors. Results In the infection group, urinary tract infection occurred in 67 cases(37.43%) and bloodstream infection in 60 cases(33.52%). A total of 179 pathogen strains were isolated. Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen(81 strains, 45.25%), including 49 extended-spectrum β-lactamase(ESBL)-producing strains(60.49%). Other pathogens included Klebsiella pneumoniae(21 strains, 11.73%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa(18 strains, 10.06%), Staphylococcus aureus and other cocci(23 strains, 12.84%), and fungi(20 strains, 11.17%). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that Escherichia coli had lower rates of resistance to imipenem(4 strains, 4.94%) and piperacillin/tazobactam(5 strains, 6.17%). ESBL-producing strains showed higher rates of resistance to cephalosporins and aztreonam than non-ESBL-producing strains(all P<0.05). Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed relatively high rates of resistance to some cephalosporins. Gram-positive bacteria showed high rates of resistance to tetracycline(17 strains, 73.91%) and penicillin G(14 strains, 60.87%). Univariate analysis showed that body mass index(BMI), diabetes/hypertension, preoperative albumin level, surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, tumor location, histological differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and tumor stage were associated with postoperative infection(all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed that BMI(OR=1.091, P=0.002), diabetes(OR=3.435, P<0.01), surgical duration(OR=1.012, P=0.003), and stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ tumor(OR=4.289, P<0.01) were independent risk factors for postoperative infection in CRC patients, whereas preoperative albumin level was a protective factor(OR=0.883, P<0.01). Conclusions Postoperative infections in CRC patients are primarily bloodstream and urinary tract infections, with Escherichia coli being the dominant pathogen showing complex resistance patterns. Postoperative infection is closely related to metabolic status, surgical trauma, and tumor progression. Optimizing antimicrobial use requires integrating pathogen surveillance with effective management of identified risk factors.

参考文献

[1] Wu YJ, He SY, Cao MD, et al. Comparative analysis of cancer statistics in China and the United States in2024[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2024, 137(24):3093-3100.

[2] 马学莹,李娜,赵航,等. 1990年和2021年中国结直肠癌发病和死亡分析及其危险因素研究[J].实用肿瘤杂志, 2025, 40(2):114-119.

[3] Naghavi M, Vollset SE, Ikuta KS, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990-2021:a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050[J]. Lancet, 2024,404(10459):1199-1226.

[4] 许世伟,唐密密,刘秋爽,等.结直肠癌围手术期药学监护专家共识[J/OL].今日药学, 2025-01-02. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/44.1650.R.20250102.1329.004.

[5] 石召强,成敏敏,于晓卫,等.结直肠癌术后腹腔感染的危险因素及风险模型建立[J].中华医院感染学杂志, 2024, 34(9):1366-1369.

[6] 梁海峰,刘新艳,梁译心,等.结直肠癌患者术后腹腔感染病原菌及其危险因素[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2023, 33(20):3099-3103.

[7] 王长峰,黄汇,司呈帅,等.结直肠癌术后切口感染危险因素及Logistic回归模型[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2023, 33(20):3104-3107.

[8] Jia L, Zhao HC, Liu J. Meta-analysis of postoperative incision infection risk factors in colorectal cancer surgery[J]. Front Surg, 2024, 11:1415357.

[9] 曲龙嘉,郑亚迪,罗姿麟,等. 2000-2019年中国早发型癌症疾病负担及危险因素变化趋势[J].实用肿瘤杂志, 2024, 39(2):97-103.

[10] 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会.结直肠癌腹膜转移诊治中国专家共识(2025版)[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2025, 40(3):193-202.

[11] 中华人民共和国卫生部.医院感染诊断标准(试行)[J].中华医学杂志, 2001, 81(5):314-320.

[12] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing[M]. 28th ed. Wayne:Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute,2018.

[13] 赵优冬,柏愚. 2022年中国结直肠癌发病与死亡特征分析[J].海军军医大学学报, 2025, 46(1):48-52.

[14] 余秋雨,崔伯塔.肠道菌群在结直肠癌发病、早诊及防治中的研究进展[J].中华消化杂志, 2023, 43(5):348-351.

[15] Calu V, Enciu O, Toma EA, et al. Surgical site infections in colorectal cancer surgeries[J]. Life, 2024, 14(7):850.

[16] 李兆龙,刘大勇,陈锁艳,等.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后腹腔感染病原菌分布及耐药性[J].中华医院感染学杂志, 2022, 32(10):1519-1523.

[17] Chen Y. Retrospective analysis of the impact of pathogen spectrum and antibiotic resistance on the treatment efficacy of respiratory tract infections from 2012 to 2022[J].Am J Transl Res, 2025, 17(1):480-488.

[18] Wang QQ, Wei SD, Silva AF, et al. Cooperative antibiotic resistance facilitates horizontal gene transfer[J]. ISME J,2023, 17(6):846-854.

[19] Tamma PD, Heil EL, Justo JA, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America 2024 guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative infections[J/OL].Clin Infect Dis, 2024-08-07. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae403.

[20] Siame A, Yamba K, Samutela M, et al. Carriage and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of rectal ESBL E. coli in surgical patients at the University Teaching Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia[J]. JAC Antimicrob Resist, 2024, 6(5):dlae159.

[21] Sanya DRA, Onésime D, Vizzarro G, et al. Recent advances in therapeutic targets identification and development of treatment strategies towards Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections[J]. BMC Microbiol, 2023, 23(1):86.

[22] 孙文轩,于淼,孟昕晶,等.内脏肥胖指数与结直肠癌手术疗效、预后及早期炎症性肠梗阻的关联[J].中国肿瘤外科杂志, 2025, 17(2):120-124.

[23] Hostetter MK. Handicaps to host defense. Effects of hyperglycemia on C3 and Candida albicans[J]. Diabetes,1990, 39(3):271-275.

[24] Shen XF, Zhou CM, Hua Q, et al. Impact of operation duration on short-term and long-term prognosis in patients undergoing radical colorectal surgery[J]. J Cancer, 2022,13(4):1160-1167.

[25] 王倩,王秋平.急性肠梗阻急诊术后切口感染的病原菌及危险因素分析[J].中国肛肠病杂志, 2024, 44(5):46-48.

[26] Li ZY, Li Z, Xu C, et al. Hypoalbuminemia is highly prevalent in patients with periprosthetic joint infection and strongly associated with treatment failure[J]. Orthop Surg,2024, 16(10):2419-2427.

[27] Greathouse KL, Stone JK, Vargas AJ, et al. Co-enrichment of cancer-associated bacterial taxa is correlated with immune cell infiltrates in esophageal tumor tissue[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14:2574.

基本信息:

DOI:10.3785/syzlzz.2026.043

引用信息:

[1]梁涯,刘道利,蔡大可,等.结直肠癌住院患者术后感染的病原菌分布特征及风险因素分析[J],2026,41(4):307-313.DOI:10.3785/syzlzz.2026.043.

基金信息:

广东省基础与应用基础研究基金自然科学基金项目(2024A1515012131); 广州市科技计划项目(2023A03J0314)

检 索 高级检索