子宫内膜癌组织中stratifin表达与临床病理特征和预后的关系Expression of stratifin in endometrial cancer and its relationship with clinicopathological features and prognosis
左世凯,王武亮,王利君,王璐,郭依琳,凡志祥,刘琳洁
摘要(Abstract):
目的 探索子宫内膜癌组织中stratifin(SFN)蛋白表达及其与临床病理特征和预后的关系。方法 癌症基因组图谱(The Cancer Genome Atlas, TCGA)数据库中比较554例子宫内膜癌组织和23例正常子宫内膜组织中SFN的表达水平。收集2017年1月至2019年12月就诊于郑州大学第二附属医院的患者的子宫内膜癌组织96例和正常子宫内膜组织60例。免疫组织化学方法检测其SFN表达水平,并分析SFN表达水平与患者临床病理特征及预后的关系。结果 TCGA数据库分析和免疫组织化学方法检测均显示,子宫内膜癌组织中SFN表达水平高于正常子宫内膜组织(均P<0.05);子宫内膜癌患者SFN表达水平在手术病理学分期方面比较,差异具有统计学意义(均P<0.01);SFN低表达患者术后无瘤生存期和总生存期均低于SFN高表达患者(均P<0.05)。Cox比例风险模型多因素分析显示,组织学分级与手术病理学分期是影响患者DFS的危险因素(均P<0.05);组织学分级与SFN表达水平是影响患者OS的危险因素(均P<0.05)。结论 子宫内膜癌组织中SFN表达水平高于正常子宫内膜组织。子宫内膜癌组织中SFN低表达的患者预后较差。
关键词(KeyWords): 子宫内膜癌;stratifin;免疫组织化学;病理特征;临床预后
基金项目(Foundation): 河南省科技攻关项目(222102310618)
作者(Author): 左世凯,王武亮,王利君,王璐,郭依琳,凡志祥,刘琳洁
DOI: 10.13267/j.cnki.syzlzz.2024.053
参考文献(References):
- [1] Doherty MT, Sanni OB, Coleman HG, et al. Concurrent and future risk of endometrial cancer in women with endometrial hyperplasia:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(4):e0232231.
- [2] Urick ME, Bell DW. Clinical actionability of molecular targets in endometrial cancer[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2019,19(9):510-521.
- [3] Sun PS, Shen Y, Wang T, et al. Distinct clinical and genetic mutation characteristics in sporadic and Lynch syndrome-associated endometrial cancer in a Chinese population[J]. Cancer Epidemiol, 2021, 73:101934.
- [4] Vermij L, Smit V, Nout R, et al. Incorporation of molecular characteristics into endometrial cancer management[J].Histopathology, 2020, 76(1):52-63.
- [5]乐露露,傅芬. MYBL2基因表达和拷贝数变异与子宫内膜癌患者预后的关系[J].实用肿瘤杂志, 2023,38(3):258-264.
- [6] Huang Y, Yang MX, Huang WG. 14-3-3σ:a potential biomolecule for cancer therapy[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2020,511:50-58.
- [7]程爱兰,唐运莲,黄卫国. 14-3-3σ蛋白表达下降在鼻咽癌发病中的意义[J].临床和实验医学杂志, 2011,10(2):90-92.
- [8] Shiba-Ishii A, Kano J, Morishita Y, et al. High expression of stratifin is a universal abnormality during the course of malignant progression of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Int J Cancer, 2011, 129(10):2445-2453.
- [9]王明. 14-3-3σ在癌前病变及食管鳞癌中表达的临床意义及与预后的相关性[D].开封:河南大学, 2014.
- [10] Diallo K, Oppong AK, Lim GE. Can 14-3-3 proteins serve as therapeutic targets for the treatment of metabolic diseases?[J]. Pharmacol Res, 2019, 139:199-206.
- [11]魏华,王明,刘瑞敏,等.食管鳞癌中14-3-3σ表达的临床意义及与预后的相关性[J].基础医学与临床, 2014,34(8):1044-1048.
- [12]牛珂,鲁永鲜.宫颈癌组织14-3-3σ蛋白表达及其临床意义[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2009, 16(6):434-435, 465.
- [13]张喆琳,廖予妹.子宫内膜癌中MMR、p53、ER和PR表达与病理特征的关系及预后分析[J].实用肿瘤杂志, 2023, 38(6):543-549.
- [14] Yen TT, Wang TL, Fader AN, et al. Molecular classification and emerging targeted therapy in endometrial cancer[J]. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 2020, 39(1):26-35.
- [15] van den Heerik ASVM, Horeweg N, de Boer SM, et al.Adjuvant therapy for endometrial cancer in the era of molecular classification:radiotherapy, chemoradiation and novel targets for therapy[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2021,31(4):594-604.